Hledat v komentářích
Investiční doporučení
Výsledky společností - ČR
Výsledky společností - Svět
IPO, M&A
Týdenní přehledy
 

Detail - články
When the World Is Not Fair

When the World Is Not Fair

3.8.2012 11:23
Autor: Alica Stegmannová, KSB

But things are not that simple.

Legal theory defines this situation as the rule of enormous loss (laesio enormis). Under this rule, a contract under which the value of consideration owed by one party is grossly disproportionate to that of the other is not generally tolerated. This also relates to usury, which was regulated by the 1811 Civil Code. The Code included a simple rule: one party may not suffer a loss of over one half of the value of what it has provided to the other.

With various modifications, the rule is included in the Austrian, Swiss and French legal systems. It is absent, however, from the Czech system. In fact, the current Civil Code contains no provisions that explicitly address unreasonably disproportionate performance.

Prudent Approach by the Courts

Naturally, unscrupulous individuals would like to take advantage of the loophole and claim that each party is free to enter into an agreement. They do not have it so easy, however. Courts are now taking a more sensible stance with regard to unbalanced agreements. Although they do not consider an unreasonably low price as grounds to nullify a purchase agreement, they are responsive to situations in which one party deliberately tries to take advantage of the other party’s ignorance or ineptitude.

For example, the Supreme Court has held that contracts may be deemed usurious if they exhibit characteristics that are both objective (an unreasonably low or high price) and subjective (e.g. mental impairment, duress, carelessness, anxiety or lack of experience on the part of the transferor). The courts must, however, first consider all the circumstances of the case; only then can a contract be deemed invalid on the grounds of a conflict of good morals.

What constitutes good morals was summarized by the Constitutional Court, which defined the term as the sum of morals and generally preserved and acknowledged principles. It is clear that when one party knowingly – and unreasonably – damages the other most people would condemn such behavior and consider it at least immoral. On the other hand, things are never so black and white. That is why the rule of good morals needs to be handled and applied with care in order to keep it from becoming an “elastic” term into which anything and everything can be stuffed.

Coming Soon: A New Approach

The new Civil Code, which will become binding in 2014, will change the approach to the laesio enormis principle. After more than two centuries, the rules – which are currently implied by the courts – will once again be set out in writing.

An aggrieved party will have the right to request that the agreement is nullified and the original situation reinstated if there is a gross disproportion between the performance rendered by each party and the other party was – or must have been – aware and refused to make up the difference. On the other hand, this will not apply when the aggrieved party explicitly waives the right or agrees with the price (even though it was aware of the amount). The rules will not even apply if the reason for the disproportion is based on a special relationship between the parties or, in certain other cases, predefined by law (such as trading on a commodities exchange).

The new Civil Code does not, however, contain an explicit definition of the term “gross disproportion”. Nor does it revive the definition in the 1811 Civil Code, which clearly stated “one half of the price”. But this has its advantages – the courts will be able to respond flexibly to particular circumstances and thus avoid any potential rigidity that could result from more strictly defined rules.


Reklama
Nově na Patria.cz - obchodní signály na forexu podle technických indikátorů ADX, Williams R% a klouzavých průměrů!
Váš názor
Na tomto místě můžete zahájit diskusi. Zatím nebyl zadán žádný názor. Do diskuse mohou přispívat pouze přihlášení uživatelé (Přihlásit). Pokud nemáte účet, na který byste se mohli přihlásit, registrujte se zde.
Aktuální komentáře
21.2.2017
12:33Smažená kuřata táhnou. Burger King chce řetězec Popeyes Inc.
11:31Anglo i BHP: Těžební kolosy chytají druhý dech. Na jak dlouho?
10:40Nálada v eurozóně je nejlepší za posledních šest let
10:18Dolar se zvedá díky výnosům, euro kvůli politice ignoruje dobrá data  
10:12JPMorgan dodává sílu akcíím Moneta, ČEZ naopak zamířil níže
9:49Technická analýza: Rostoucí preference Le Penové posílají kurz eurodolaru níže
9:41Rozbřesk: Bude OPEC muset prodloužit dohodu na omezení produkce?
8:57Tomáš Pleskač z ČEZu bude od března šéfem divize Nová energetika a distribuce
8:54Trhy se dnes rozběhnou opět naplno. ČEZ otestuje směr dolů a Moneta dál neporoste?  
8:38Daně podle ČSSD: Tři pásma pro firmy, vyšší zatížení vyšších mezd
8:32V akciové Asii vládne optimismus. Přílivy hotovosti a dobrá nálada trhy posiluje  
8:01Zisk HSBC loni kvůli mimořádným položkám klesl o 62 procent
6:28Historie se bude opakovat, robotizace přinese problémy
20.2.2017
20:11Americká ekonomika na hraně přehřívání, Evropa drží měnové trumfy
19:13Telegraph: Rusové plánovali puč v Černé Hoře. Ti se proti tomu ohradili
17:33Bilance Fedu, ECB a eurodolar
17:08Pražská burza se v úvodu týdne zazelenala. Telekomunikace O2 padá a ministr Mládek s ní
16:46Dolar i libra zmenšily své ztráty, aktivitu tlumí svátek  
16:30Citi: "Doktorka" měď se vrací na trhy
15:38Jan Mládek skončí v čele ministerstva průmyslu. Nástupcem Prouza?

Související komentáře
Nejčtenější zprávy dne
Nejčtenější zprávy týdne
Nejdiskutovanější zprávy týdne
Denní kalendář hlavních událostí
ČasUdálost
BHP Billiton Ltd (03/17 Q3)
First Solar Inc (12/16 Q4, Aft-mkt)
Macquarie Infrastructure Corp (12/16 Q4, Aft-mkt)
Nabors Industries Ltd (12/16 Q4)
Newmont Mining Corp (12/16 Q4, Aft-mkt)
1:30JP - PMI v průmyslu
5:00HSBC Holdings PLC (12/16 Q4)
8:00Anglo American PLC
9:30DE - PMI v průmyslu
10:00EMU - PMI v průmyslu
12:00Home Depot Inc/The (01/17 Q4)
12:45Medtronic PLC (01/17 Q3)
13:00Wal-Mart Stores Inc (01/17 Q4)
14:00Macy's Inc (01/17 Q4)