Hledat v komentářích
Investiční doporučení
Výsledky společností - ČR
Výsledky společností - Svět
IPO, M&A
Týdenní přehledy
 

Detail - články
Long Live China’s Boom

Long Live China’s Boom

06.08.2013 12:01

After three decades of 9.8% average annual GDP growth, China’s economic expansion has been slowing for 13 consecutive quarters – the first such extended period of deceleration since the “reform and opening up” policy was launched in 1979. Real GDP grew at an annual rate of only 7.5% in the second quarter of this year (equal to the target actually set by the Chinese government at the beginning of this year). Many indicators point to further economic deceleration, and there is a growing bearishness among investors about the outlook for China. Will China crash?

In fact, many other rapidly growing emerging economies have suffered – and worse than China – from the drop in global demand resulting from ongoing retrenchment in high-income economies since the 2008 financial crisis. For example, GDP growth in Brazil has slowed sharply, from 7.5% in 2010 to 2.7% in 2011 and to just 0.9% in 2012, while India’s growth rate slowed from 10.5% to 3.2% over the same period.

Moreover, many high-income newly industrialized economies (NIEs) with few structural problems were not spared the effects of the 2008 crisis. South Korea’s GDP growth slowed from 6.3% in 2010 to 3.7% in 2011 and to 2% in 2012; Taiwan’s fell from 10.7% to 1.3% over this period; and Singapore’s plummeted from 14.8% to 1.3%.

Given this, China’s economic slowdown since the first quarter of 2010 has apparently been caused mainly by external and cyclical factors. Facing an external shock, the Chinese government should and can maintain a 7.5% growth rate by taking counter-cyclical and proactive fiscal-policy measures, while maintaining a prudent monetary policy. After all, China has high private and public savings, foreign reserves exceeding $3.3 trillion, and great potential for industrial upgrading and infrastructure improvement.

Indeed, China can maintain an 8% annual GDP growth rate for many years to come, because modern economic growth is a process of continuous technological innovation and industrial upgrading. Of course, this is true for developed and developing countries alike. But developed countries differ from developing countries in an important way. Since the Industrial Revolution, developed countries have always been on the global frontier of technologies and industries, which has required them to invest in costly and risky indigenous research and development.

By contrast, technologies and existing industries in developing countries are in general well within the global frontier. As a result, they benefit from the “latecomer’s advantage”: technological innovation and industrial upgrading can be achieved by imitation, import, and/or integration of existing technologies and industries, all of which implies much lower R&D costs.

In theory, any developing country that can harness its latecomer’s advantage to achieve technological and industrial upgrading can grow faster than developed countries. How much faster is an empirical question. According to the Growth Commission led by Nobel laureate Michael Spence, 13 economies took full advantage of their latecomer status after World War II and achieved annual GDP growth rates of 7% or higher – at least twice as high as developed countries’ growth rates – for 25 years or longer.

China became one of the 13 economies after 1979. Because the country’s latecomer status explains its 33 years of rapid economic growth, the key to understanding its potential for further rapid growth in the future lies in estimating how large those advantages still are.

Per capita GDP, which reflects a country’s average labor productivity and its overall technological and industrial achievement, is a useful proxy to estimate latecomer’s advantage. That is, the per capita GDP gap between China and developed countries essentially reflects the gap between them in terms of overall technological and industrial achievement.

According to the most up-to-date estimate by the late economic historian Angus Maddison, China’s per capita GDP in 2008 was $6,725 in 1990 dollars, which was 21% of per capita GDP in the United States. That is roughly the same gap that existed between the US and Japan in 1951, Singapore in 1967, Taiwan in 1975, and South Korea in 1977 – four economies that are also among the 13 successful economies studied by the Growth Commission. Harnessing their latecomer’s advantage, Japan’s average annual growth rate soared to 9.2% over the subsequent 20 years, compared to 8.6% in Singapore, 8.3% in Taiwan, and 7.6% in South Korea.

If the latecomer’s advantage implied by the income gap between the four NIEs and the US enabled the NIEs to realize average annual GDP growth rates of 7.6%-9.2% for 20 years, China’s annual growth potential should be a similar 8% for the 2008-2028 period. To realize its potential growth as a latecomer, China needs, above all, to deepen its market-oriented reforms, address various structural problems, and develop its economy according to its comparative advantages.

Justin Yifu Lin, a former chief economist and senior vice president at the World Bank, is Professor and Honorary Dean of the National School of Development, Peking University, and the founding director of the China Center for Economic Research.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2013.


Váš názor
Na tomto místě můžete zahájit diskusi. Zatím nebyl zadán žádný názor. Do diskuse mohou přispívat pouze přihlášení uživatelé (Přihlásit). Pokud nemáte účet, na který byste se mohli přihlásit, registrujte se zde.
Aktuální komentáře
16.07.2025
18:23Jsou americké akcie drahé, nebo jen nad svým valuačním standardem? To mohou být dvě rozdílné věci
16:55Evropská komise chce výrazně zvýšit sedmiletý rozpočet: z 1,2 na dva biliony eur
16:53Wall Street balancuje kolem včerejšího závěru po slušných datech, výsledcích a varování z technologického sektoru  
16:36Komerční banka, a.s.: Změna členů dozorčí rady KB k 16.7.2025
15:13Výsledky Bank of America: Bankám se daří těžit ze zvýšené volatility na trzích  
14:56Tradeři Goldman Sachs měli žně. Očekávání Wall Street banka nechala daleko za sebou
14:53Morgan Stanley překonala odhady, dařilo se obchodování s akciemi
13:19Naznačují americké indexy korekci?  
13:15Bank of America předčila očekávání, dařilo se tradingu i divizi poskytování úvěrů
12:42Braňo Soták: Nejsou sankce jako sankce, neschopnost ASML potvrdit růst posílá akcie dolů  
12:16Správci fondů posílají hotovost do akce, podle BofA to může být varovný signál
11:38Inflace v Británii v červnu vzrostla na 3,6 procenta, je nejvyšší od února 2024
11:26Akcie automobilky Renault prudce klesají. Firma představila nové vedení a snížila výhled
10:55V příštím roce nemusíme růst, varuje ASML. Akcie padají o 7 %
10:34Bloomberg: Ellison sesadil Zuckerberga z pozice druhého nejbohatšího člověka
10:16Němečtí odborníci navrhují solidární daň pro baby boomery mířící do důchodu
9:52Ceny v průmyslu klesají, zemědělci a potravináři dále zdražují
8:57Rozbřesk: Signál a šum v americké červnové inflaci
8:46Výsledky dodala ASML, sezóna bude pokračovat v americkém finančním sektoru. Evropa zahájí ztrátově  
8:12Dohoda s Vietnamem je podle Trumpa takřka hotová, USA oznámí cla pro menší země

Související komentáře
Nejčtenější zprávy dne
Nejčtenější zprávy týdne
Nejdiskutovanější zprávy týdne
Kalendář událostí
ČasUdálost
Alcoa Corp (06/25 Q2, Aft-mkt)
Progressive Corp/The (06/25 Q2, Bef-mkt)
Prologis Inc (06/25 Q2, Bef-mkt)
United Airlines Holdings Inc (06/25 Q2, Aft-mkt)
7:00ASML Holding NV (06/25 Q2)
9:00CZ - PPI, y/y
12:30First Horizon Corp (06/25 Q2)
12:45Bank of America Corp (06/25 Q2)
12:45Johnson & Johnson (06/25 Q2)
13:30Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The (06/25 Q2)
13:30Morgan Stanley (06/25 Q2)
14:30USA - PPI, y/y
15:15USA - Průmyslová výroba, m/m