Hledat v komentářích
Investiční doporučení
Výsledky společností - ČR
Výsledky společností - Svět
IPO, M&A
Týdenní přehledy
 

Detail - články
Fixed-term employment: Thank God for an about face!

Fixed-term employment: Thank God for an about face!

02.04.2013 11:35
Autor: Viktor Zelinka, KSB

What applied yesterday no longer applies today, and nobody knows whether what should apply tomorrow actually will. A similar situation can be seen regarding the regulation of fixed-term employment relationships, where recently the lower house approved what was cancelled only a short time ago.

Limiting successive fixed-term employment may have seemed like an excellent idea to legislators eighteen months ago when the amendment to the Labour Code was being prepared. In practice, however, it caused panic.

Last year’s amendment allowed a fixed-term employment contract to be entered into for up to three years with the possibility to extend the relationship only twice. Renewal was also to be understood as extension of the same employment terms. Any previous fixed-term employment contracts that ended more than three years ago were to be disregarded.

Cause for concern

On one hand, the 2012 amendment was welcomed as it increased the total length of a fixed-term employment contract to up to nine years instead of the previous two. However, because exceptions to the limitation of fixed-term contracts were annulled, many employers started to worry, particularly those in the construction and agriculture industries.

Employers were forced to consider whether they wanted to extend employment further, which would mean concluding an indefinite term employment agreement. In particular, they had to take into account potential claims by the employee (e.g. lost wage compensation or severance pay). This was a significant dilemma for employers who did not have long-term or year-round work but who did not want to lose good employees. Employers looking for workers to carry out tasks whose duration was not yet defined were also undoubtedly troubled by the three-year limit that, if exceeded, could considerably change the terms of the employment contract, especially if the contract were poorly designed.

For many industries, the option of waiting for three years to break the chain of employment in order to be able to enter into a new agreement for a fixed period was not realistic. The current legal regulation thus, without entirely reasonable grounds, often forces employers to terminate employment that both the employer and employee wish to preserve.

Exceptions make a comeback

Fortunately, an amendment appeared in late December / early January that sought to bring back the legal status existing before 1 January 2012. In principle, the bill allows a fixed-term employment contract to be extended without limitation and no longer disregards fixed-term contracts that ended more than three years ago; it also allows such contracts to be extended for a longer period of time. But only, in the words of the bill, “if grounds exist due to which it cannot justly be requested to conclude an employment relationship for a fixed period”. The MPs passed the amendment at the end of March.

The fly in the ointment, however, is that the “just grounds” are not specified in the amendment. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that they are the exceptions that were cancelled a year ago and are now being brought back to life, namely those relating to the seasonal character of the work, serious operational difficulties of the employer, or the special nature of the work. The operational point specifically, but also the rules for negotiating and repeating an employment relationship for a fixed term, the circle of relevant employees and other restricting conditions must once again be stipulated in a written agreement with a trade union or by an internal regulation if no trade unions are established at the employer.

We believe that the aim of the amendment will be accomplished, i.e. in the legislators’ words “to make the labour market more flexible and improve competitiveness”, which is almost literally an incentive for adopting the current wording without any further legislative somersaults. 

Váš názor
Na tomto místě můžete zahájit diskusi. Zatím nebyl zadán žádný názor. Do diskuse mohou přispívat pouze přihlášení uživatelé (Přihlásit). Pokud nemáte účet, na který byste se mohli přihlásit, registrujte se zde.
Aktuální komentáře
11.05.2025
10:02Víkendář: Kdyby Fed přestal pomáhat jiným centrálním bankám…
10.05.2025
10:06Víkendář: První měkké přistání v historii USA a nejhorší makroekonomická politika prezidenta v historii
09.05.2025
22:01Zámořské indexy uzavřely týden bez větších změn  
17:24Ziskové žně
17:16Trump jako zastánce otevřených trhů? Wall Street ani tak neudržela úvodní zisky  
16:06Hartnett: Růst amerických akcií končí, dejte přednost dluhopisům
14:24Německé banky se připravují na boom v obranném sektoru
13:48Komerční banka, a.s.: Zápis z Valné hromady KB konané dne 24.4.2025
12:31Perly týdne: Asijská krize naruby
12:03Trhy mají snížení cel za hotovou věc. Amerika před jednáním s Čínou odkryla karty  
10:58Ohnsman: Muskovi dochází nápady na záchranu Tesly. Jaké jsou její akciové alternativy?
10:09Trumpova obchodní dohoda: Britské vozy v USA za nižší clo, americké automobilky protestují
10:04Růst maloobchodních tržeb v Česku: Internetové prodeje a pohonné hmoty na vzestupu
9:16Rozbřesk: NBP sice srazila sazby o 50 bps, ale na další agresivní redukce to nevypadá
9:07Čínský vývoz v dubnu rostl více, než se čekalo, vývoz do USA ale klesl
8:51Nový papež, obchodní dohody a úleva pro emisní normy. Evropské futures jsou v zeleném  
6:06Barro: Fiskální výdaje ekonomice příliš nepomohou, ale lze je zaplatit inflací
08.05.2025
22:01Americké akcie rostly po komentářích Donalda Trumpa  
17:09Signály k nákupům…
15:20Trump se opět opřel do šéfa Fedu poté, co ponechal sazby na stejné úrovni. Podle něj je to "hlupák" a "ztroskotanec"

Související komentáře
    Nejčtenější zprávy dne
    Nejčtenější zprávy týdne
    Nejdiskutovanější zprávy týdne
    Kalendář událostí
    Nebyla nalezena žádná data