Hledat v komentářích
Investiční doporučení
Výsledky společností - ČR
Výsledky společností - Svět
IPO, M&A
Týdenní přehledy
 

Detail - články
The Monetary Cosmopolitans

The Monetary Cosmopolitans

28.03.2014 18:22

Can you imagine a French citizen being elected President of the United States? Or a Japanese prime minister of the United Kingdom? Or a Mexican chancellor of Germany? Probably not. Indeed, even if there were no legal obstacles, it would be difficult to imagine voters in a democracy installing a foreigner in their government’s top job.

But, during the last few years, countries have increasingly turned to foreigners and people with considerable foreign experience to assume what is generally viewed as a country’s second most important position: head of the central bank. What has driven this shift, and should it be welcomed or discouraged?

For example, Stanley Fischer, nominated in January by US President Barack Obama to succeed Janet Yellen as Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve, is an American immigrant from southern Africa who served as Governor of the Bank of Israel from 2005 until last year. And, in July 2013, Mark Carney, a Canadian who had served as central-bank governor in his home country, became the first foreigner to lead the Bank of England in its nearly 320-year history.

Similarly, the widely respected governor of Ireland’s central bank, Patrick Honohan, spent nearly a decade at the World Bank in Washington, DC. One of Honohan’s deputies is a Swede with experience at the Hong Kong Monetary Authority; the other is a Frenchman.

This represents a major departure from the tradition of filling central banks’ top leadership positions with people who have spent most of their careers there – a tradition that, over time, allowed central banks to be taken over by “groupthink.” With the entrenchment of a particular ideology or mode of thinking, monetary policymakers increasingly missed – by choice or inertia – opportunities to change, reinvigorate, and improve the running of these vital institutions.

As central banks’ key role in the recovery from the post-2008 global economic crisis demonstrated, monetary policy must be flexible and innovative. That is where the different perspectives that foreigners bring can help.

The Fed’s experience – shaped by a historically decentralized power structure – highlights the benefits of a policymaking process characterized by diverse views. When the Fed was established a century ago, monetary authority was distributed across 12 regional reserve banks, each of which had considerable autonomy. The fact that the heads of each of the regional Fed banks were called “governor” – the same title given to heads of the long-established European central banks – was indicative of their authority.

But, in the aftermath of the Great Depression of the 1930’s, it became clear that such decentralization had prevented the Fed from formulating and implementing a coherent monetary policy. The heads of the regional banks were “downgraded” from governors to “presidents” – the first and only time in US history when the transition from governor to president was a demotion – and power was centralized in the Board of Governors based in Washington, DC.

Nonetheless, an important legacy of the earlier system has remained: each of the regional banks maintains its own research department, and brings a different approach to the monetary-policy debate. In other words, the Fed’s structure continues to foster a robust and diverse mix of views – something that is severely lacking in many other central banks.

Consider the Bank of Canada. Years ago, an employee at one of the regional Fed banks – who was also my graduate-school classmate – contrasted the responses to his research presentations in the United States and Canada. Whereas staff economists from the Federal Reserve System brought differing perspectives to the monetary-policy debate, their Canadian counterparts seemed to subscribe to a single “Bank of Canada view.”

Two independent reviews of the Bank of England published in the wake of the global financial crisis found a similar lack of intellectual diversity and robust debate. One observed that Bank of England staff members tended to “filter” their advice to make it more palatable to their superiors. The other concluded that the crisis highlighted just how wrong the consensus view had been, and recommended a new approach that considered divergent views. This desire for change may have contributed to Carney’s appointment as the new governor, and his recent decision to bring more outside expertise into the Bank’s leadership.

Avoiding groupthink is essential to developing innovative, effective policies capable of responding to new monetary-policy challenges – and that demands a flexible, dynamic policymaking process.

The good news is that central banks have options for enriching their policy debates, even without the benefit of the Fed’s size, structure, and geographic spread. For starters, they can establish committees of outside experts or commission regular external reviews of policy and the policymaking process. Such reviews typically take place only after a crisis – when it is already too late.

Another solution is to appoint a governor from outside the central bank, preferably one who has enough external experience to avoid being captured by groupthink.

Or, perhaps better yet, they can hire a foreigner.

Richard S. Grossman is a professor of economics at Wesleyan University and a visiting scholar at Harvard University’s Institute for Quantitative Social Science. His most recent book is WRONG: Nine Economic Policy Disasters and What We Can Learn from Them.

Váš názor
Na tomto místě můžete zahájit diskusi. Zatím nebyl zadán žádný názor. Do diskuse mohou přispívat pouze přihlášení uživatelé (Přihlásit). Pokud nemáte účet, na který byste se mohli přihlásit, registrujte se zde.
Aktuální komentáře
28.09.2022
11:30Riziko recese stoupá. Goldmani i BlackRock se otáčí k akciím zády, doporučují investiční dluhopisy
9:33Evropská banka pro obnovu a rozvoj zhoršila výhled růstu ekonomik a varovala před inflací
8:51Poškození plynovodů Nord Stream bylo asi úmyslné, prohlásila švédská premiérka
7:09Probíhají strukturální změny, které ještě nejsou plně odraženy v cenách akcií, tvrdí investor Jensen
27.09.2022
22:01Wall Street uzavírá smíšeně. S&P 500 ukázal nová minima  
17:38Děravý Nord Stream, příprava na akci BoE a klesající ceny domů  
17:32Poloměkké, nebo polotvrdé přistání?
16:54Wall Street se snaží o obrat, rostoucí ropa pomáhá energetikám  
16:54Spotřebitelská důvěra v USA v září opět vzrostla, přispěl k tomu levnější benzin
16:22Podíl Londýna na primárních nabídkách akcií v Evropě klesl nejníže za 12 let
15:40Cílené útoky na plynovody Nord Stream 1 i Nord Stream 2? Úniky na více místech, potvrzeny silné podmořské výbuchy
15:36UNIMEX GROUP, uzavřený investiční fond, a. s.: Pololetní zpráva k 30.6.2022
13:46Akcie mohou jít nahoru i přes korekce ziskových očekávání, domnívá se ekonomka. Probíhají strukturální změny
12:09Summers: Postup Fedu je vítaný, Velká Británie začíná připomínat rozvíjející se zemi
11:54Nálada německých exportérů v září znovu klesla, je nejníže od května 2020
11:38EPH Financing CZ, a.s.: Oprava výroční zprávy společnosti za rok 2021
11:31RMS Mezzanine, a.s.: Konsolidovaná pololetní zpráva společnosti za 1. pololetí roku 2022
11:14Světová banka kvůli zpomalení růstu v Číně zhoršila výhled růstu východní Asie
11:07Po negativní sérii si trhy vybírají oddechový čas, akcie a dluhopisy opatrně rostou  
11:02NET4GAS, s.r.o.: Sdělení skupiny NET4GAS a jejích společníků k současné situaci na trhu

Související komentáře
Nejčtenější zprávy dne
Nejčtenější zprávy týdne
Nejdiskutovanější zprávy týdne
Kalendář událostí
ČasUdálost
Jefferies Financial Group Inc (08/22 Q3, Aft-mkt)
Thor Industries Inc (07/22 Q4, Bef-mkt)