Hledat v komentářích
Investiční doporučení
Výsledky společností - ČR
Výsledky společností - Svět
IPO, M&A
Týdenní přehledy
 

Detail - články
Have you lent someone money? If so, be wary of the due date. Based on a Supreme Court ruling, this may not be what it seems

Have you lent someone money? If so, be wary of the due date. Based on a Supreme Court ruling, this may not be what it seems

17.4.2012 14:16
Autor: Richard Hamran, KSB

The lender’s apparent upper hand in the lender-borrower relationship conceals unexpected pitfalls following a Supreme Court ruling.

Imagine that you enter into a loan agreement under which the borrower agrees to repay the loan on demand. A year or two passes and, because you do not for the moment need the money back, you wait and do not call the loan in. You believe that the statutory limitation period is on your side and cannot start to run before the due date of the loan, which is the moment when you demand repayment. You do not worry that time is passing. Big mistake. You may not have the chance to get your money back once three years has elapsed from the time when the loan was granted.

The catch is the three-year limitation period

It is wrong to believe that the statutory limitation period begins on the due date of the loan. On the contrary, whoever “keeps track” of the three-year limitation period from time when the money was loaned is in the right. At first glance this conclusion is not clear when reading applicable provisions of the Civil Code, but it is in fact rooted in the Supreme Court’s case law of more than 20 years.

Last year the issue re-emerged in a case that reached the Czech Supreme Court. Certain parties entered into a loan agreement under which the loan was to be repaid on the lender’s demand. The lender demanded repayment; however, after almost a year of waiting for the borrower to repay the loan, the lender filed a lawsuit. In the first two instances, the defendant was not successful in claiming that the demand was made three years after the loan was granted (and the debt was established). Both courts ruled that the lawsuit was filed on time since three years had not lapsed from the time when the lender demanded repayment. The defendant was unable to defend his position.

However, the courts were overruled by the Supreme Court, which found their conclusions to be incorrect. The Court reiterated that, when no particular due date is agreed or otherwise determined, the limitation period starts on the day after the debt comes into being. This implies that the lender may even demand the loan to be repaid (and exercise his rights) on the day after it is granted. The day decisive for the beginning of the limitation period is therefore the day following the establishment of the so-agreed legal relationship and not the due date of the loan (the first day after the lender demands repayment).

To justify the opinion that the beginning of the limitation period cannot be coupled with the due date of the loan, the Supreme Court held that, in the given scenario, one could postpone the beginning of the limitation period almost indefinitely.

What the Supreme Court held is not accepted unequivocally. Critics claim that the ruling confuses the lender’s right to have the loan repaid with the lender’s right to demand repayment. In other words, the right to demand is vested in the lender when the loan is made, while the right to have the loan repaid depends on the demand. Each right is subject to an independent three-year limitation period.

One opinion favours legal certainty while the other favours the freedom of lenders. However, before the case law responds to the critics’ opinions, I recommend that the current conservative principle is followed. To avoid any doubt, let me add that the conclusion outlined in this article only applies to obligations and commitments subject to the Civil Code. Commercial obligations and commitments where parties agree to leave the due date to the lender’s discretion are, on the contrary, subject to a limitation period that commences on the due date determined by the lender.

Reklama
Nově na Patria.cz - obchodní signály na forexu podle technických indikátorů ADX, Williams R% a klouzavých průměrů!
Váš názor
Na tomto místě můžete zahájit diskusi. Zatím nebyl zadán žádný názor. Do diskuse mohou přispívat pouze přihlášení uživatelé (Přihlásit). Pokud nemáte účet, na který byste se mohli přihlásit, registrujte se zde.
Aktuální komentáře
21.2.2017
22:03Goldmani věští konec rally, Wall Street to vidí jinak
18:54Co nyní kupuje Warren Buffett
17:21Pražskou burzu zabrzdil ČEZ a Erste s KB. Otěže převzal Unipetrol
17:17Summary: HSBC zažila špatné čtvrtletí, nedařilo se ani Macy’s
16:47Měnové trhy ovládla politika. Euro ztrácí díky preferencím Le Penové  
15:38Valuační prémie amerických akcií je ohrožena
15:08Bohuslav Sobotka: Nové bloky jaderných elektráren? Riziková investice, která přinese příjmy
15:04Zlato se chová divně. Úřaduje velký kupec?
14:54Wal-Mart: E-tržby razantně rostou. Bude ofenziva?
14:39Yahoo a Verizon se dohodly na snížení původní ceny akvizice o 350 milionů dolarů
14:19Francie, nebo Itálie? Která země by pro investory mohla být skutečnou hrozbou?
12:33Smažená kuřata táhnou. Burger King chce řetězec Popeyes Inc.
11:31Anglo i BHP: Těžební kolosy chytají druhý dech. Na jak dlouho?
10:40Nálada v eurozóně je nejlepší za posledních šest let
10:18Dolar se zvedá díky výnosům, euro kvůli politice ignoruje dobrá data  
10:12JPMorgan dodává sílu akcíím Moneta, ČEZ naopak zamířil níže
9:49Technická analýza: Rostoucí preference Le Penové posílají kurz eurodolaru níže
9:41Rozbřesk: Bude OPEC muset prodloužit dohodu na omezení produkce?
8:57Tomáš Pleskač z ČEZu bude od března šéfem divize Nová energetika a distribuce
8:54Trhy se dnes rozběhnou opět naplno. ČEZ otestuje směr dolů a Moneta dál neporoste?  

Související komentáře
    Nejčtenější zprávy dne
    Nejčtenější zprávy týdne
    Nejdiskutovanější zprávy týdne
    Denní kalendář hlavních událostí
    ČasUdálost
    0:00BHP Billiton Ltd (03/17 Q3)
    0:00First Solar Inc (12/16 Q4, Aft-mkt)
    0:00Macquarie Infrastructure Corp (12/16 Q4, Aft-mkt)
    0:00Nabors Industries Ltd (12/16 Q4)
    0:00Newmont Mining Corp (12/16 Q4, Aft-mkt)
    1:30JP - PMI v průmyslu
    5:00HSBC Holdings PLC (12/16 Q4)
    8:00Anglo American PLC
    9:30DE - PMI v průmyslu
    10:00EMU - PMI v průmyslu
    12:00Home Depot Inc/The (01/17 Q4)
    12:45Medtronic PLC (01/17 Q3)
    13:00Wal-Mart Stores Inc (01/17 Q4)
    14:00Macy's Inc (01/17 Q4)